🏠 Home E2E Tower Architecture
🤖 IAO Architecture Assistant AI-Powered
Welcome! I can answer questions about RICEFW objects, build readiness, architecture patterns, and towers across the IAO IDM 2.0 program. What would you like to know?
Phase 1 · GitHub Actions backend · ~30-60s response time
IAO Architecture

E2E-53 — Purchase Requisition to Payments for Indirect procurement (simple material or services like H

Architecture Document (TOGAF BDAT)

End-to-End Integrated Processes (E2E) Tower
Capability E2E-53 · Procure to Pay

IAO Program · R1 – R5
Generated: April 2026
Sajiv Francis

IAO Architecture Pipeline — Intel Confidential

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

This Architecture Document defines the Business, Data, Application, and Technology (BDAT) architecture for E2E-53 Purchase Requisition to Payments for Indirect procurement (simple material or services like H within the IAO program. It includes 1 BPMN process diagram(s) in Section 3.

Dimension Value
Tower End-to-End Integrated Processes (E2E)
Process Group Procure to Pay
Capability E2E-53 - Purchase Requisition to Payments for Indirect procurement (simple material or services like H
Release R1 – R5
Total Systems 2
System Status 0 Deployed, 0 Developing, 0 EOL, 2 Pending IAPM
RICEFW Objects Pending — Smartsheet Object Tracker API integration

Change Summary: 0 new flow chains, 0 removed, 0 modified, 1 unchanged between Current-State and Future-State states.

All system nodes in architecture diagrams are IAPM-linked — click any node to open its IAPM page. Diagrams require securityLevel: 'loose' for click events.

2. Business Context & Objectives

2.1 Classification

Level Value
L0 Tower End-to-End Integrated Processes
L1 Process Procure to Pay
L2 Capability E2E-53 - Purchase Requisition to Payments for Indirect procurement (simple material or services like H

2.2 Business Drivers

# Driver Description Strategic Alignment Priority
1 End-to-End Process Integration Enable cross-tower integrated processes spanning procurement, manufacturing, and fulfillment IDM 2.0 Process Excellence High
2 Intel Foundry Business Enablement Stand up foundry-specific business processes for external customer engagement Intel Foundry Services High
3 Process Visibility & Monitoring Provide end-to-end process visibility across tower boundaries with integrated monitoring Operational Excellence Medium
4 E2E-53 Process Migration Migrate Purchase Requisition to Payments for Indirect procurement (simple material or services like H business processes and 2 integrated systems from legacy to S/4 HANA target architecture IDM 2.0 Cross-Functional / End-to-End High

2.3 Success Criteria

Metric Target Measure Baseline Owner
E2E Process Cycle Time Per process SLA End-to-end transaction completion within defined SLA per process Varies by process E2E Process Owner
Cross-Tower Integration Success > 99% Transactions completing across tower boundaries without manual intervention 92% (current) Integration Lead
Process Exception Rate < 2% Transactions requiring manual exception handling 8% (current) Operations Manager
E2E-53 Migration Completeness 100% flow chains validated All 1 flow chains verified in target state 0% (pre-migration) Tower Architect

2.4 Companion Documents

Document Description
Business Architecture Included in this document (Section 3) — process flows from BPMN diagrams
This Document Full BDAT Architecture — Business + Data + Application + Technology

3. Business Architecture (TOGAF “B”)

3.1 Business Process Overview

This capability includes 1 business process(es) modeled in BPMN 2.0, covering the end-to-end workflow for E2E-53 Purchase Requisition to Payments for Indirect procurement (simple material or services like H.

# Step ID Process Name Lanes Tasks Gateways
1 E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H Boundary Apps, MBC, SAP Ariba, SAP Ariba Network, SAP CFIN, SAP Fieldglass, SAP Fieldglass Network

, SAP S/4 (IP & IF)

| 50 | 20 |

3.2 Business Process Diagrams

BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE — 3.2.1 E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H — E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H

Swim Lanes: Boundary Apps · MBC · SAP Ariba · SAP Ariba Network · SAP CFIN · SAP Fieldglass · SAP Fieldglass Network · SAP S/4 (IP & IF)

| Tasks: 50 | Gateways: 20

Legend: ● Start · ● End · User Task · Service Task · ◇ Gateway · Sub-Process

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'fontSize': '14px', 'fontFamily': 'Segoe UI, Arial, sans-serif','primaryColor': '#e8f0fe', 'primaryBorderColor': '#0071c5','lineColor': '#37474F', 'secondaryColor': '#f5f8fc'}, 'flowchart': {'useMaxWidth': false, 'htmlLabels': true, 'curve': 'basis', 'nodeSpacing': 40, 'rankSpacing': 50}} }%% flowchart LR classDef startEvt fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#2E7D32,color:#000,font-weight:bold,stroke-width:2px,rx:20,ry:20 classDef endEvt fill:#C62828,stroke:#B71C1C,color:#fff,font-weight:bold,stroke-width:2px,rx:20,ry:20 classDef userTask fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:2px,color:#0D47A1 classDef serviceTask fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:2px,color:#BF360C classDef gateway fill:#FFF9C4,stroke:#F57F17,stroke-width:2px,color:#E65100 classDef subProc fill:#F3E5F5,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px,color:#4A148C subgraph lane_0["Boundary Apps"] n4["Validate/Handle Exception Based on Rules setup in Readsoft"] n5["Receive Invoice/ B2B/OpenText/Web suite/ Email"] n6["Receive File in Bank"] n7["Payment Received"] n8["Hard Copy to be processed through optical character recognition (OCR)"] n54(["fa:fa-stop Payment Data Updated"]) n61{{"fa:fa-code-branch exclusiveGateway"}} end subgraph lane_1["MBC"] n48["Multi-Bank Connectivity (host-to-host)"] n49["Multi-Bank Connectivity (host-to-host)"] end subgraph lane_2["SAP Ariba"] n16["Create Ariba Operational Contract"] n17["Publish Contract Catalogue"] n18["Create Text Material without catalogs"] n19["Create Indirect Purchase Requisition"] n20["Create Non-PO Contract Purchases"] n21["Create Integrated Catalog within Spot Buy"] n22["Punchout Catalog item"] n23["Select Intel Internal Catalog"] n24["Select item from Hosted Catalog"] n25["Validate Purchase Requisition Budget Check in Ariba (Capital Item Only),..."] n26["Create Indirect Purchase Requisition"] n27["Approve Indirect Purchase Requisition"] n28["Initiate Purchase Order Creation"] n29["Purchase Order Created"] n30["Replicate Goods Receipt"] n31["Reconcile Supplier Invoice"] n51(["fa:fa-play Ariba Operational Contract Initiated"]) n52(["fa:fa-play Initiate Non-PO Contract Purchases"]) n58(["fa:fa-stop Goods Receipt Replicated"]) n65{{"fa:fa-code-branch exclusiveGateway"}} n75{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} n76{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} n77{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} n78{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} end subgraph lane_3["SAP Ariba Network"] n1["Receive Purchase Order"] n2["Send Purchase Order Confirmation"] n3["Create/Submit/Validate Supplier Invoice"] end subgraph lane_4["SAP CFIN"] n37["Replicate Supplier Invoice Posting"] n38["Generate Payment Proposal"] n39["Execute Payment Run"] n40["Create APM Memo Record"] n41["Process BCM Payment Batching Based on Business Rules"] n42["Generate APM Payment File"] n43["Route to Approver"] n44["Correct APM Correction File"] n45["Reverse APP Doc Number and Memo Record Deletion"] n46["Payments Factory (APM, BCM, MBC Monitor)"] n47["Review Failed Payment Log"] n59(["fa:fa-stop Memo Record Created"]) n60(["fa:fa-stop APP Doc Reversed"]) n66{{"fa:fa-code-branch Manual Approval Necessary?"}} n67{{"fa:fa-code-branch Approved?"}} n68{{"fa:fa-code-branch exclusiveGateway"}} n69{{"fa:fa-code-branch Can Be Corrected?"}} n70{{"fa:fa-code-branch exclusiveGateway"}} n71{{"fa:fa-code-branch exclusiveGateway"}} n72{{"fa:fa-code-branch exclusiveGateway"}} n73{{"fa:fa-code-branch Reversal or Reprocessing?"}} n79{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} n80{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} end subgraph lane_5["SAP Fieldglass"] n32["Update SOW/Work Order"] n33["Validate Document Against SOW and Approval"] n34["Create SOW/Work Order"] n53(["fa:fa-play SOW/Work Order Creation Initiated"]) end subgraph lane_6["SAP Fieldglass Network "] n35["Add Details About Work Performed Against SOW"] n36["Submit Timesheet, Expense Receipt, Another Document per SOW"] end subgraph lane_7["SAP S/4 (IP & IF) "] n9["Validate Replicate Requisition Budget Check in SAP S/4 (Capital Item Only),..."] n10["Replicate Indirect Purchase Requisition"] n11["Replicate Indirect Purchase Order"] n12["Calculate Taxes"] n13["Post Goods Receipt"] n14["Instruct Supplier About Rejected Invoice"] n15["Post Supplier invoice"] n50[["fa:fa-cog Send Supplier Invoice"]] n55(["fa:fa-stop Payment Details provided back to Source System (IP/IF)"]) n56(["fa:fa-stop Indirect Purchase Requisition Replicated"]) n57(["fa:fa-stop Taxes Calculated"]) n62{{"fa:fa-code-branch exclusiveGateway"}} n63{{"fa:fa-code-branch Invoice Accepted?"}} n64{{"fa:fa-code-branch Indirect Material/Service?"}} n74{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} end n16 --> n17 n25 --> n9 n26 --> n27 n28 --> n11 n35 --> n36 n36 --> n33 n65 --> n25 n62 --> n64 n29 --> n75 n13 --> n30 n30 --> n58 n5 --> n61 n63 -->|"No"| n14 n15 --> n37 n38 --> n39 n39 --> n79 n40 --> n59 n79 -->|"Reprocessing"| n70 n41 --> n66 n66 -->|"No"| n68 n66 -->|"Yes"| n43 n43 --> n67 n67 -->|"No"| n69 n70 --> n41 n67 -->|"Yes"| n68 n71 --> n45 n72 --> n44 n75 --> n32 n79 --> n40 n76 --> n10 n76 --> n28 n74 --> n29 n80 --> n47 n42 --> n48 n44 --> n70 n7 --> n54 n52 --> n20 n18 --> n65 n20 --> n3 n34 --> n18 n77 --> n21 n77 --> n22 n77 --> n23 n77 --> n24 n21 --> n78 n22 --> n78 n23 --> n78 n24 --> n78 n78 --> n65 n27 --> n76 n73 -->|"Reversal"| n71 n73 -->|"Reprocessing"| n72 n2 --> n62 n17 --> n19 n75 --> n1 n1 --> n2 n51 --> n16 n19 --> n77 n9 --> n26 n33 --> n62 n3 --> n31 n49 --> n46 n80 --> n55 n32 --> n35 n37 --> n38 n69 -->|"Yes"| n72 n12 --> n57 n53 --> n34 n69 -->|"No"| n71 n46 --> n80 n47 --> n73 n45 --> n60 n68 --> n42 n6 -->|"PAIN.002 (Pay-load file)"| n49 n48 -->|"PAIN.001 (Pay-load file)"| n6 n80 --> n7 n10 --> n56 n11 --> n74 n74 --> n12 n64 -->|"Service"| n50 n64 -->|"Material"| n13 n63 -->|"Yes"| n15 n61 --> n4 n4 --> n63 n8 --> n61 n31 --> n5 class n50 serviceTask class n51 startEvt class n52 startEvt class n53 startEvt class n54 endEvt class n55 endEvt class n56 endEvt class n57 endEvt class n58 endEvt class n59 endEvt class n60 endEvt class n61 gateway class n62 gateway class n63 gateway class n64 gateway class n65 gateway class n66 gateway class n67 gateway class n68 gateway class n69 gateway class n70 gateway class n71 gateway class n72 gateway class n73 gateway class n74 gateway class n75 gateway class n76 gateway class n77 gateway class n78 gateway class n79 gateway class n80 gateway
👁 View Diagram

3.3 Business Roles & Responsibilities

Role / Lane Processes Involved Description
Boundary Apps E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H
MBC E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H
SAP Ariba E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H
SAP Ariba Network E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H
SAP CFIN E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H
SAP Fieldglass E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H
SAP Fieldglass Network
E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H
SAP S/4 (IP & IF)
E2E-53_Purchase_Requisition_to_Payments_for_Indirect_procurement_(simple_material_or_services_like_H

4. Data Architecture (TOGAF “D”)

4.1 Data Flows — Source to Target

# Flow Chain Hop Source App Source DB Target App Target DB Data Description Frequency Classification
1 e.g. MES Route to ICOST 1 e.g. MES 300 e.g. SAP HANA e.g. XEUS e.g. Azure SQL What data moves e.g. Near Real-Time e.g. Intel Confidential

4.2 Data Flow Diagrams

DATA ARCHITECTURE — Database-to-database data flows. Applications (blue) sit above their hosting databases (green cylinders). Thick arrows show data movement between databases.

4.2.1 Current-State — Current-State Data Flows

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "15px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 35, "rankSpacing": 45}} }%% flowchart TB classDef appBox fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef dbCyl fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:2px,color:#1B5E20 classDef dbCloud fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef dbData fill:#B2EBF2,stroke:#00838F,stroke-width:2px,color:#004D40 classDef eolBox fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C subgraph E2E53CDACL_e_g_Azure_SQL[" "] direction TB E2E53CDAA_e_g_XEUS["e.g. XEUS"]:::appBox E2E53CDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL[("🗄️ e.g. Azure SQL")]:::dbCloud E2E53CDAA_e_g_XEUS -.-> E2E53CDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL end style E2E53CDACL_e_g_Azure_SQL fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:1px subgraph E2E53CDACL_e_g_SAP_HANA[" "] direction TB E2E53CDAA_e_g_MES_300["e.g. MES 300"]:::appBox E2E53CDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA[("🗄️ e.g. SAP HANA")]:::dbData E2E53CDAA_e_g_MES_300 -.-> E2E53CDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA end style E2E53CDACL_e_g_SAP_HANA fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:1px E2E53CDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA ==>|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E53CDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL subgraph Legend["📐 DATA ARCHITECTURE LEGEND"] direction LR L_A["Application"]:::appBox L_D[("🗄️ On-Prem DB")]:::dbCyl L_DC[("🗄️ Cloud DB")]:::dbCloud L_DD[("🗄️ Data Platform")]:::dbData L_E["End-of-Life"]:::eolBox end style Legend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px
👁 View Diagram

4.2.2 Future-State — Future-State Data Flows

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "15px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 35, "rankSpacing": 45}} }%% flowchart TB classDef appBox fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef dbCyl fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:2px,color:#1B5E20 classDef dbCloud fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef dbData fill:#B2EBF2,stroke:#00838F,stroke-width:2px,color:#004D40 classDef eolBox fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C subgraph E2E53FDACL_e_g_Azure_SQL[" "] direction TB E2E53FDAA_e_g_XEUS["e.g. XEUS"]:::appBox E2E53FDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL[("🗄️ e.g. Azure SQL")]:::dbCloud E2E53FDAA_e_g_XEUS -.-> E2E53FDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL end style E2E53FDACL_e_g_Azure_SQL fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:1px subgraph E2E53FDACL_e_g_SAP_HANA[" "] direction TB E2E53FDAA_e_g_MES_300["e.g. MES 300"]:::appBox E2E53FDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA[("🗄️ e.g. SAP HANA")]:::dbData E2E53FDAA_e_g_MES_300 -.-> E2E53FDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA end style E2E53FDACL_e_g_SAP_HANA fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:1px E2E53FDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA ==>|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E53FDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL subgraph Legend["📐 DATA ARCHITECTURE LEGEND"] direction LR L_A["Application"]:::appBox L_D[("🗄️ On-Prem DB")]:::dbCyl L_DC[("🗄️ Cloud DB")]:::dbCloud L_DD[("🗄️ Data Platform")]:::dbData L_E["End-of-Life"]:::eolBox end style Legend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px
👁 View Diagram

4.3 Data Lineage

# Source System Source Schema/Object Target System Target Schema/Object Transformation
1 e.g. MES 300 e.g. CKMLHD table e.g. XEUS e.g. dbo.CostElements Lineage notes

4.4 RICEFW Data Objects

RICEFW data objects (Reports and Conversions) will be auto-populated from the Smartsheet Object Tracker when matched to this capability.

4.5 Data Governance & Quality

Concern Approach
Data Ownership Per-entity owners listed in Section 3.1
Data Classification Financial data classified as Intel Confidential
Data Retention Per Intel corporate retention policies
Data Quality Validated at source; reconciliation at target

5. Application Architecture (TOGAF “A”)

5.1 Current-State — Current-State Application Landscape

Overview

The Current-State architecture represents the current / legacy landscape for E2E-53.This view is generated from CurrentFlows.xlsx (1 flow hops across 1 flow chains).

APPLICATION ARCHITECTURE — Architecture Diagram

Click any system node to open its IAPM application page. Legend: Deployed · Developing · End-of-Life · No IAPM Match

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "18px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial, sans-serif"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 50, "rankSpacing": 60}} }%% flowchart TB %% -- ArchiMate 3.2 + Azure style classes -- classDef business fill:#FFFFB3,stroke:#F9A825,stroke-width:2px,color:#000 classDef app fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef data fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:1px,color:#0D47A1,stroke-dasharray: 5 5 classDef middleware fill:#FFE0B2,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:2px,color:#BF360C classDef eol fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C classDef saas fill:#E1BEE7,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px,color:#4A148C classDef cloud fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:2px,color:#0D47A1 classDef onprem fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:2px,color:#1B5E20 subgraph E2E53CLN_Boundary_Applications[" Boundary Applications"] direction LR E2E53C_e_g_MES_300["📦 e.g. MES 300"]:::app E2E53C_e_g_XEUS["📦 e.g. XEUS"]:::app end E2E53CMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus["🔗 e.g. Azure Service Bus"]:::middleware E2E53CDE_e_g_Cost_Element>"📄 e.g. Cost Element
e.g. CSV / IDoc / JSON"]:::data E2E53C_e_g_MES_300 -->|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E53CMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus E2E53CMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus --> E2E53C_e_g_XEUS style E2E53CLN_Boundary_Applications fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px subgraph Legend["📐 LEGEND"] direction LR L_APP["📦 Application"]:::app L_MW["🔗 Middleware"]:::middleware L_DE>"📄 Data Entity"]:::data L_EOL["⛔ End-of-Life"]:::eol end style Legend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px
👁 View Diagram

Current-State Flow Narrative

# Flow Chain Path Interface Freq
1 e.g. MES Route to ICOST e.g. MES 300 → e.g. XEUS e.g. Direct / API / File e.g. Near Real-Time

5.2 Future-State — Future-State Application Landscape

Overview

The Future-State architecture represents the target landscape for E2E-53.This view is generated from FutureFlows.xlsx (1 flow hops across 1 flow chains).

APPLICATION ARCHITECTURE — Architecture Diagram

Click any system node to open its IAPM application page. Legend: Deployed · Developing · End-of-Life · No IAPM Match

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "18px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial, sans-serif"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 50, "rankSpacing": 60}} }%% flowchart TB %% -- ArchiMate 3.2 + Azure style classes -- classDef business fill:#FFFFB3,stroke:#F9A825,stroke-width:2px,color:#000 classDef app fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef data fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:1px,color:#0D47A1,stroke-dasharray: 5 5 classDef middleware fill:#FFE0B2,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:2px,color:#BF360C classDef eol fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C classDef saas fill:#E1BEE7,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px,color:#4A148C classDef cloud fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:2px,color:#0D47A1 classDef onprem fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:2px,color:#1B5E20 subgraph E2E53FLN_Boundary_Applications[" Boundary Applications"] direction LR E2E53F_e_g_MES_300["📦 e.g. MES 300"]:::app E2E53F_e_g_XEUS["📦 e.g. XEUS"]:::app end E2E53FMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus["🔗 e.g. Azure Service Bus"]:::middleware E2E53FDE_e_g_Cost_Element>"📄 e.g. Cost Element
e.g. CSV / IDoc / JSON"]:::data E2E53F_e_g_MES_300 -->|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E53FMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus E2E53FMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus --> E2E53F_e_g_XEUS style E2E53FLN_Boundary_Applications fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px subgraph Legend["📐 LEGEND"] direction LR L_APP["📦 Application"]:::app L_MW["🔗 Middleware"]:::middleware L_DE>"📄 Data Entity"]:::data L_EOL["⛔ End-of-Life"]:::eol end style Legend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px
👁 View Diagram

Future-State Flow Narrative

# Flow Chain Path Interface Freq
1 e.g. MES Route to ICOST e.g. MES 300 → e.g. XEUS e.g. Direct / API / File e.g. Near Real-Time

5.3 Change Impact Summary

Change Type Flow Chain Detail
UNCHANGED e.g. MES Route to ICOST No change

Totals: 0 new - 0 removed - 0 modified - 1 unchanged

5.4 Component Overview

System Inventory

System IAPM ID Status
e.g. MES 300 - N/A
e.g. XEUS - N/A

5.5 RICEFW Inventory

RICEFW inventory will be auto-populated from the Smartsheet S/4 Object Tracker when matched to this capability.

5.6 Integration Patterns

# Pattern Flow Chain Middleware Protocol Auth
1 e.g. Pub-Sub / P2P / ETL e.g. MES Route to ICOST e.g. Azure Service Bus e.g. REST / RFC / SFTP e.g. OAuth / NTLM / Cert

6. Technology Architecture (TOGAF “T”)

6.1 Platform & Infrastructure

TECHNOLOGY / PLATFORM ARCHITECTURE — Platforms (green) host applications (blue). Thick arrows show platform-to-platform integration flows.

6.1.1 Current-State — Current-State Platform Architecture

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "14px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 40, "rankSpacing": 50}} }%% flowchart TB classDef appBox fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef platBox fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 classDef eolBox fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C subgraph E2E53CPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS["☁️ e.g. Azure PaaS"] direction LR E2E53CPLA_e_g_XEUS["e.g. XEUS"]:::appBox end style E2E53CPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:3px,color:#003A6C subgraph E2E53CPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023["🖥️ e.g. S/4 HANA 2023"] direction LR E2E53CPLA_e_g_MES_300["e.g. MES 300"]:::appBox end style E2E53CPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023 fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 E2E53CPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023 ==>|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E53CPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS subgraph E2E53CPLLegend["📐 PLATFORM LEGEND"] direction LR E2E53CPLLC["☁️ Cloud"] E2E53CPLLS["🔮 SaaS"] E2E53CPLLO["🏢 On-Prem"] E2E53CPLLD["💾 Data Platform"] E2E53CPLLM["🔗 Middleware"] end style E2E53CPLLegend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px style E2E53CPLLC fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:3px,color:#003A6C style E2E53CPLLS fill:#E1BEE7,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:3px,color:#4A148C style E2E53CPLLO fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 style E2E53CPLLD fill:#B2EBF2,stroke:#00838F,stroke-width:3px,color:#004D40 style E2E53CPLLM fill:#FFE0B2,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:3px,color:#BF360C
👁 View Diagram

Legend: 🖥️ Platform · 📦 Application · ⛔ End-of-Life · 📋 Unassigned

6.1.2 Future-State — Future-State Platform Architecture

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "14px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 40, "rankSpacing": 50}} }%% flowchart TB classDef appBox fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef platBox fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 classDef eolBox fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C subgraph E2E53FPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS["☁️ e.g. Azure PaaS"] direction LR E2E53FPLA_e_g_XEUS["e.g. XEUS"]:::appBox end style E2E53FPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:3px,color:#003A6C subgraph E2E53FPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023["🖥️ e.g. S/4 HANA 2023"] direction LR E2E53FPLA_e_g_MES_300["e.g. MES 300"]:::appBox end style E2E53FPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023 fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 E2E53FPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023 ==>|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E53FPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS subgraph E2E53FPLLegend["📐 PLATFORM LEGEND"] direction LR E2E53FPLLC["☁️ Cloud"] E2E53FPLLS["🔮 SaaS"] E2E53FPLLO["🏢 On-Prem"] E2E53FPLLD["💾 Data Platform"] E2E53FPLLM["🔗 Middleware"] end style E2E53FPLLegend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px style E2E53FPLLC fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:3px,color:#003A6C style E2E53FPLLS fill:#E1BEE7,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:3px,color:#4A148C style E2E53FPLLO fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 style E2E53FPLLD fill:#B2EBF2,stroke:#00838F,stroke-width:3px,color:#004D40 style E2E53FPLLM fill:#FFE0B2,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:3px,color:#BF360C
👁 View Diagram

Legend: 🖥️ Platform · 📦 Application · ⛔ End-of-Life · 📋 Unassigned

Platform Inventory

# Platform Type Systems Using Environment
1 e.g. Azure PaaS Cloud / SaaS e.g. XEUS DEV,QAS,PRD
2 e.g. S/4 HANA 2023 On-Premise e.g. MES 300 DEV,QAS,PRD

6.2 SAP Development Object Status

Metric DEV QAS PRD
Transport Requests
Custom Code Objects
CDS Views
Fiori Apps
BAdIs / Enhancements

6.3 NFRs & Design Principles

Category Requirement Target / SLA Priority
Performance Order/transaction processing within interactive SLA < 3 seconds for online transactions High
Availability Business-critical systems available during extended hours 99.9% (06:00-22:00 all time zones) High
Scalability Support seasonal and promotional volume spikes Handle 2x baseline transaction volume Medium
Recoverability Customer-facing systems recover within business impact window RPO < 30 min, RTO < 2 hours High
Data Volume Support transactional data growth from business expansion 10M+ documents/year Medium
Latency Near-real-time integration for order status updates < 30 seconds for status propagation Medium
Concurrency Support global user base across business functions 300+ concurrent users Medium

6.4 Security & Governance

Concern Approach Standard / Policy Owner
Authentication Single Sign-On (SSO) via Intel corporate Azure AD identity Intel IT Security Policy - Identity Management IT Security
Authorization Role-based access control (RBAC) with SAP authorization objects Intel SAP Security Standards - Role Design SAP Security Team
Data Classification All financial/operational data classified per Intel Data Classification Standard Intel Data Classification Policy Data Governance
Data Encryption (at rest) AES-256 encryption for SAP HANA database and file storage Intel Encryption Standard Infrastructure Security
Data Encryption (in transit) TLS 1.3 for all system-to-system and user-to-system communication Intel Network Security Policy Network Engineering
Network Segmentation SAP systems in dedicated network zones with firewall controls Intel Network Architecture Standard Network Security
API Security OAuth 2.0 / certificate-based authentication for all API integrations Intel API Security Guidelines Integration Architecture
Audit Logging Comprehensive audit trail for all data changes and user actions (SAP Security Audit Log) SOX Compliance / Intel Audit Policy Internal Audit
Certificate Management Automated certificate lifecycle management for system-to-system trust Intel PKI Standard Certificate Authority Team
Compliance SOX controls, export control (EAR/ITAR) screening, data privacy (GDPR) Intel Corporate Compliance Framework Compliance Office

7. Project Context

7.1 Project Roadmap & Go-Live Plan

Project roadmap and RICEFW timelines will be auto-populated from the Smartsheet Object Tracker when matched to this capability.

7.2 RAID Log

RAID items will be auto-populated from the Smartsheet RAID log when matched to this capability.

7.3 Recommendations & Next Steps

# Category Recommendation Priority Owner Target Date Status
1 Architecture Complete extended flow attributes (Data Entity, Integration Pattern, Tech Platform) in Flows tab for full BDAT coverage High Tower Architect 2026-Q2 Open
2 Data Define data ownership and classification for all 1 flow chains to satisfy Data Architecture (TOGAF D) requirements Medium Data Architect 2026-Q3 Open
3 Testing Develop integration test scenarios covering all 1 flow chains for FUT/SIT readiness High Test Lead 2026-Q3 Open
4 Business Architecture Review and validate Business Architecture process steps against latest Signavio/BIC process models Medium Business Analyst 2026-Q2 Open
5 Security Complete security review for API integrations and data flows per Intel Security Architecture standards Medium Security Architect 2026-Q3 Open

E2E-53 — Architecture Document (TOGAF BDAT) · End-to-End Integrated Processes · Generated: April 2026