🏠 Home E2E Tower Architecture
🤖 IAO Architecture Assistant AI-Powered
Welcome! I can answer questions about RICEFW objects, build readiness, architecture patterns, and towers across the IAO IDM 2.0 program. What would you like to know?
Phase 1 · GitHub Actions backend · ~30-60s response time
IAO Architecture

E2E-113 — R3 IMR Labs Process

Architecture Document (TOGAF BDAT)

End-to-End Integrated Processes (E2E) Tower
Capability E2E-113 · Forecast to Stock

IAO Program · R1 – R5
Generated: April 2026
Sajiv Francis

IAO Architecture Pipeline — Intel Confidential

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

This Architecture Document defines the Business, Data, Application, and Technology (BDAT) architecture for E2E-113 R3 IMR Labs Process within the IAO program. It includes 4 BPMN process diagram(s) in Section 3.

Dimension Value
Tower End-to-End Integrated Processes (E2E)
Process Group Forecast to Stock
Capability E2E-113 - R3 IMR Labs Process
Release R1 – R5
Total Systems 2
System Status 0 Deployed, 0 Developing, 0 EOL, 2 Pending IAPM
RICEFW Objects Pending — Smartsheet Object Tracker API integration

Change Summary: 0 new flow chains, 0 removed, 0 modified, 1 unchanged between Current-State and Future-State states.

All system nodes in architecture diagrams are IAPM-linked — click any node to open its IAPM page. Diagrams require securityLevel: 'loose' for click events.

2. Business Context & Objectives

2.1 Classification

Level Value
L0 Tower End-to-End Integrated Processes
L1 Process Forecast to Stock
L2 Capability E2E-113 - R3 IMR Labs Process

2.2 Business Drivers

# Driver Description Strategic Alignment Priority
1 End-to-End Process Integration Enable cross-tower integrated processes spanning procurement, manufacturing, and fulfillment IDM 2.0 Process Excellence High
2 Intel Foundry Business Enablement Stand up foundry-specific business processes for external customer engagement Intel Foundry Services High
3 Process Visibility & Monitoring Provide end-to-end process visibility across tower boundaries with integrated monitoring Operational Excellence Medium
4 E2E-113 Process Migration Migrate R3 IMR Labs Process business processes and 2 integrated systems from legacy to S/4 HANA target architecture IDM 2.0 Cross-Functional / End-to-End High

2.3 Success Criteria

Metric Target Measure Baseline Owner
E2E Process Cycle Time Per process SLA End-to-end transaction completion within defined SLA per process Varies by process E2E Process Owner
Cross-Tower Integration Success > 99% Transactions completing across tower boundaries without manual intervention 92% (current) Integration Lead
Process Exception Rate < 2% Transactions requiring manual exception handling 8% (current) Operations Manager
E2E-113 Migration Completeness 100% flow chains validated All 1 flow chains verified in target state 0% (pre-migration) Tower Architect

2.4 Companion Documents

Document Description
Business Architecture Included in this document (Section 3) — process flows from BPMN diagrams
This Document Full BDAT Architecture — Business + Data + Application + Technology

3. Business Architecture (TOGAF “B”)

3.1 Business Process Overview

This capability includes 4 business process(es) modeled in BPMN 2.0, covering the end-to-end workflow for E2E-113 R3 IMR Labs Process.

# Step ID Process Name Lanes Tasks Gateways
1 E2E-113A_IMR_Labs_Process_–_To-Be_from_IP_to_IF E2E-113A_IMR_Labs_Process_–_To-Be_from_IP_to_IF Boundary Apps , Intel Foundry Lab, SAP S/4

Intel Foundry IMR | 21 | 4 |

| 2 | E2E-113B_IMR_Labs_Process_–To-Be_within_IF_Different_Legal_Entity_(Part_1) | E2E-113B_IMR_Labs_Process_–To-Be_within_IF_Different_Legal_Entity_(Part_1) | Intel Foundry Lab, SAP S/4

Intel Foundry IMR | 22 | 3 |

| 3 | E2E-113C_IMR_Labs_Process_–To-Be_within_IF_Different_Legal_Entity)(Part_2) | E2E-113C_IMR_Labs_Process–To-Be_within_IF_Different_Legal_Entity)_(Part_2) | Intel Foundry Lab, SAP S/4

Intel Foundry IMR | 16 | 1 |

| 4 | E2E-113D_IMR_Labs_Process_–To-Be_within_IF_Same_Legal_Entity&within_Same_Plant | E2E-113D_IMR_Labs_ProcessTo-Be_within_IF_Same_Legal_Entity&_within_Same_Plant | IF Lab S. Loc, SAP S/4

IMR S . Loc. | 12 | 1 |

3.2 Business Process Diagrams

BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE — 3.2.1 E2E-113A_IMR_Labs_Process_–To-Be_from_IP_to_IF — E2E-113A_IMR_Labs_Process–_To-Be_from_IP_to_IF

Swim Lanes: Boundary Apps · Intel Foundry Lab · SAP S/4 Intel Foundry IMR | Tasks: 21 | Gateways: 4

Legend: ● Start · ● End · User Task · Service Task · ◇ Gateway · Sub-Process

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'fontSize': '14px', 'fontFamily': 'Segoe UI, Arial, sans-serif','primaryColor': '#e8f0fe', 'primaryBorderColor': '#0071c5','lineColor': '#37474F', 'secondaryColor': '#f5f8fc'}, 'flowchart': {'useMaxWidth': false, 'htmlLabels': true, 'curve': 'basis', 'nodeSpacing': 40, 'rankSpacing': 50}} }%% flowchart LR classDef startEvt fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#2E7D32,color:#000,font-weight:bold,stroke-width:2px,rx:20,ry:20 classDef endEvt fill:#C62828,stroke:#B71C1C,color:#fff,font-weight:bold,stroke-width:2px,rx:20,ry:20 classDef userTask fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:2px,color:#0D47A1 classDef serviceTask fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:2px,color:#BF360C classDef gateway fill:#FFF9C4,stroke:#F57F17,stroke-width:2px,color:#E65100 classDef subProc fill:#F3E5F5,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px,color:#4A148C subgraph lane_0["Boundary Apps "] n1["Trigger part request"] n22(["fa:fa-play Initiate part request"]) end subgraph lane_1["Intel Foundry Lab"] n4[["fa:fa-cog Create Sub-Con Purchase Requisition"]] n5[["fa:fa-cog Create Sub-Con Purchase Order with IMR as Supplier"]] n6[["fa:fa-cog Perform Issue Defective Material against SubCon PO"]] n7[["fa:fa-cog Regular Purchase Requisition​"]] n8[["fa:fa-cog Regular Purchase Order with IMR as Supplier​"]] n9[["fa:fa-cog IBD and GR against Regular PO"]] n10[["fa:fa-cog Send IMR invoice to IP through regular PO"]] n11[["fa:fa-cog IBD and GR against SubCon PO"]] n12[["fa:fa-cog Send IMR invoice to Ip through Subcon PO"]] n23(["fa:fa-stop IMR Labs Process To-Be from IP to IF Process Completed"]) n24(["fa:fa-stop Good Received"]) n25(["fa:fa-stop IMR Invoice Sent"]) n26(["fa:fa-stop Goods Received against SubCon PO"]) n32{{"fa:fa-code-branch exclusiveGateway"}} n33{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} end subgraph lane_2["SAP S/4 Intel Foundry IMR"] n2["fa:fa-user Create Create Prod. Order"] n3["fa:fa-user Create PM Repair Order"] n13[["fa:fa-cog Perform Goods Receipt against Prod. Order"]] n14[["fa:fa-cog Perform/Complete Repair"]] n15[["fa:fa-cog Perform OBD and Goods issue against Repair Sales order"]] n16[["fa:fa-cog Send Invoice to IP"]] n17[["fa:fa-cog Perform OBD and Goods issue against regular Sales order"]] n18[["fa:fa-cog Send Invoice to IP"]] n19[["fa:fa-cog IBD and Perform Goods Receipt (Customer Stock)"]] n20[["fa:fa-cog Repair Sales Order"]] n21[["fa:fa-cog Create Regular Sales Order with IP labs as customer"]] n27(["fa:fa-stop Repair Sales Order Created"]) n28(["fa:fa-stop Goods Received"]) n29(["fa:fa-stop Regular SO Created"]) n30(["fa:fa-stop PM Order Created"]) n31(["fa:fa-stop Production Order Created"]) n34{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} n35{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} end n15 --> n35 n4 --> n5 n5 --> n33 n7 --> n8 n14 --> n15 n13 --> n17 n17 --> n34 n34 --> n18 n18 --> n10 n16 --> n12 n34 --> n9 n8 --> n21 n33 --> n6 n33 --> n20 n20 --> n27 n6 --> n19 n19 --> n28 n21 --> n29 n3 --> n30 n2 --> n31 n9 --> n24 n10 --> n25 n11 --> n26 n35 --> n16 n35 --> n11 n12 --> n23 n22 --> n1 n1 --> n32 n32 --> n4 n32 --> n7 class n2 userTask class n3 userTask class n4 serviceTask class n5 serviceTask class n6 serviceTask class n7 serviceTask class n8 serviceTask class n9 serviceTask class n10 serviceTask class n11 serviceTask class n12 serviceTask class n13 serviceTask class n14 serviceTask class n15 serviceTask class n16 serviceTask class n17 serviceTask class n18 serviceTask class n19 serviceTask class n20 serviceTask class n21 serviceTask class n22 startEvt class n23 endEvt class n24 endEvt class n25 endEvt class n26 endEvt class n27 endEvt class n28 endEvt class n29 endEvt class n30 endEvt class n31 endEvt class n32 gateway class n33 gateway class n34 gateway class n35 gateway
👁 View Diagram

Swim Lanes: Intel Foundry Lab · SAP S/4 Intel Foundry IMR | Tasks: 22 | Gateways: 3

Legend: ● Start · ● End · User Task · Service Task · ◇ Gateway · Sub-Process

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'fontSize': '14px', 'fontFamily': 'Segoe UI, Arial, sans-serif','primaryColor': '#e8f0fe', 'primaryBorderColor': '#0071c5','lineColor': '#37474F', 'secondaryColor': '#f5f8fc'}, 'flowchart': {'useMaxWidth': false, 'htmlLabels': true, 'curve': 'basis', 'nodeSpacing': 40, 'rankSpacing': 50}} }%% flowchart TD classDef startEvt fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#2E7D32,color:#000,font-weight:bold,stroke-width:2px,rx:20,ry:20 classDef endEvt fill:#C62828,stroke:#B71C1C,color:#fff,font-weight:bold,stroke-width:2px,rx:20,ry:20 classDef userTask fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:2px,color:#0D47A1 classDef serviceTask fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:2px,color:#BF360C classDef gateway fill:#FFF9C4,stroke:#F57F17,stroke-width:2px,color:#E65100 classDef subProc fill:#F3E5F5,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px,color:#4A148C subgraph lane_0["Intel Foundry Lab"] n1["AR Posting and Auto Clearing​"] n2["AP Posting and Auto Clearing​"] n7[["fa:fa-cog Create Intercompany STR 1"]] n8[["fa:fa-cog Create Intercompany STO 1"]] n9[["fa:fa-cog Perform Inbound Del . against STO1"]] n10[["fa:fa-cog Perform Goods Receipt for STO1"]] n11[["fa:fa-cog Create Intercompany STR 2 (Supp. Plant as IF Lab and Rec. Plant as IMR)"]] n12[["fa:fa-cog Create Intercompany STO 2"]] n13[["fa:fa-cog Perform Outbound Del . against STO2"]] n14[["fa:fa-cog Post Goods Issue against STO2"]] n15[["fa:fa-cog Create IC Invoice 2"]] n23(["fa:fa-play :IMR Labs Process – To-Be from IP to IF"]) n24(["fa:fa-play Intercompany STR2 Process Created"]) n25(["fa:fa-stop To-Be within IF Different Legal Entity) Process Completed"]) n26(["fa:fa-stop AP Posting Cleared"]) n27(["fa:fa-stop Intercompany STO1 Created"]) n33{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} end subgraph lane_1["SAP S/4 Intel Foundry IMR"] n3["AP Posting and Auto Clearing​"] n4["AR Posting and Auto Clearing​"] n5["fa:fa-user Create Create Prod. Order"] n6["fa:fa-user Create PM Repair Order"] n16[["fa:fa-cog Perform Goods Receipt against Prod. Order"]] n17[["fa:fa-cog Perform/Complete Repair"]] n18[["fa:fa-cog Perform Outbound Del ivery against STO1"]] n19[["fa:fa-cog Perform Post Goods Issue against STO1"]] n20[["fa:fa-cog Create IC Invoice 1"]] n21[["fa:fa-cog Perform Inbound Delivery"]] n22[["fa:fa-cog Perform Goods Receipt against STO2 at IMR"]] n28(["fa:fa-stop AP Posting Cleared"]) n29(["fa:fa-stop Production Order Created"]) n30(["fa:fa-stop PM Order Created"]) n31(["fa:fa-stop Goods Received"]) n32{{"fa:fa-code-branch exclusiveGateway"}} n34{{"fa:fa-arrows-alt parallelGateway"}} end n18 --> n19 n11 --> n12 n12 --> n13 n13 --> n14 n14 --> n33 n23 --> n7 n7 --> n8 n34 --> n9 n9 --> n10 n10 --> n25 n34 --> n20 n33 --> n15 n24 --> n11 n33 --> n21 n21 --> n22 n19 --> n34 n15 --> n1 n1 --> n3 n3 --> n28 n2 --> n26 n4 --> n2 n5 --> n29 n6 --> n30 n17 --> n32 n32 --> n18 n8 --> n27 n22 --> n31 n16 --> n32 n20 --> n4 class n5 userTask class n6 userTask class n7 serviceTask class n8 serviceTask class n9 serviceTask class n10 serviceTask class n11 serviceTask class n12 serviceTask class n13 serviceTask class n14 serviceTask class n15 serviceTask class n16 serviceTask class n17 serviceTask class n18 serviceTask class n19 serviceTask class n20 serviceTask class n21 serviceTask class n22 serviceTask class n23 startEvt class n24 startEvt class n25 endEvt class n26 endEvt class n27 endEvt class n28 endEvt class n29 endEvt class n30 endEvt class n31 endEvt class n32 gateway class n33 gateway class n34 gateway
👁 View Diagram

Swim Lanes: Intel Foundry Lab · SAP S/4 Intel Foundry IMR | Tasks: 16 | Gateways: 1

Legend: ● Start · ● End · User Task · Service Task · ◇ Gateway · Sub-Process

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'fontSize': '14px', 'fontFamily': 'Segoe UI, Arial, sans-serif','primaryColor': '#e8f0fe', 'primaryBorderColor': '#0071c5','lineColor': '#37474F', 'secondaryColor': '#f5f8fc'}, 'flowchart': {'useMaxWidth': false, 'htmlLabels': true, 'curve': 'basis', 'nodeSpacing': 40, 'rankSpacing': 50}} }%% flowchart LR classDef startEvt fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#2E7D32,color:#000,font-weight:bold,stroke-width:2px,rx:20,ry:20 classDef endEvt fill:#C62828,stroke:#B71C1C,color:#fff,font-weight:bold,stroke-width:2px,rx:20,ry:20 classDef userTask fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:2px,color:#0D47A1 classDef serviceTask fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:2px,color:#BF360C classDef gateway fill:#FFF9C4,stroke:#F57F17,stroke-width:2px,color:#E65100 classDef subProc fill:#F3E5F5,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px,color:#4A148C subgraph lane_0["Intel Foundry Lab"] n3[["fa:fa-cog Create Intracompany STR 1"]] n4[["fa:fa-cog Create Intracompany STO 1"]] n11[["fa:fa-cog Perform Inbound Del . against STO1"]] n12[["fa:fa-cog Perform Goods Receipt for STO1"]] n17(["fa:fa-play :IMR Labs Process – To-Be from IP to IF"]) n18(["fa:fa-stop To-Be within IF Different Legal Entity) Process Completed"]) n20(["fa:fa-stop Intracompany STO Created"]) n24[["fa:fa-folder-open Applicable in case of repair only to transfer defective part"]] end subgraph lane_1["SAP S/4 Intel Foundry IMR"] n1["fa:fa-user Create Create Prod. Order"] n2["fa:fa-user Create PM Repair Order"] n13[["fa:fa-cog Perform Goods Receipt against Prod. Order"]] n14[["fa:fa-cog Perform/Complete Repair"]] n15[["fa:fa-cog Perform Outbound Del ivery against STO1"]] n16[["fa:fa-cog Perform Post Goods Issue against STO1"]] n21(["fa:fa-stop Production Order Created"]) n22(["fa:fa-stop PM Order Created"]) n23{{"fa:fa-code-branch exclusiveGateway"}} end n5[["fa:fa-cog Create Intracompany STO 2"]] n6[["fa:fa-cog Perform Outbound Del . against STO2"]] n7[["fa:fa-cog Post Goods Issue against STO2"]] n8[["fa:fa-cog Create Intracompany STR 2 (Supp. Plant as IF Lab and Rec. Plant as IMR)"]] n9[["fa:fa-cog Perform Inbound Delivery"]] n10[["fa:fa-cog Perform Goods Receipt against STO2 at IMR"]] n19(["fa:fa-stop Goods Received"]) n8 --> n5 n5 --> n6 n9 --> n10 n7 --> n9 n6 --> n7 n10 --> n19 n15 --> n16 n17 --> n3 n3 --> n4 n11 --> n12 n12 --> n18 n23 --> n15 n16 --> n11 n14 --> n23 n13 --> n23 n1 --> n21 n2 --> n22 n4 --> n20 class n1 userTask class n2 userTask class n3 serviceTask class n4 serviceTask class n5 serviceTask class n6 serviceTask class n7 serviceTask class n8 serviceTask class n9 serviceTask class n10 serviceTask class n11 serviceTask class n12 serviceTask class n13 serviceTask class n14 serviceTask class n15 serviceTask class n16 serviceTask class n17 startEvt class n18 endEvt class n19 endEvt class n20 endEvt class n21 endEvt class n22 endEvt class n23 gateway class n24 subProc
👁 View Diagram

Swim Lanes: IF Lab S. Loc · SAP S/4 IMR S . Loc. | Tasks: 12 | Gateways: 1

Legend: ● Start · ● End · User Task · Service Task · ◇ Gateway · Sub-Process

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'fontSize': '14px', 'fontFamily': 'Segoe UI, Arial, sans-serif','primaryColor': '#e8f0fe', 'primaryBorderColor': '#0071c5','lineColor': '#37474F', 'secondaryColor': '#f5f8fc'}, 'flowchart': {'useMaxWidth': false, 'htmlLabels': true, 'curve': 'basis', 'nodeSpacing': 40, 'rankSpacing': 50}} }%% flowchart LR classDef startEvt fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#2E7D32,color:#000,font-weight:bold,stroke-width:2px,rx:20,ry:20 classDef endEvt fill:#C62828,stroke:#B71C1C,color:#fff,font-weight:bold,stroke-width:2px,rx:20,ry:20 classDef userTask fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:2px,color:#0D47A1 classDef serviceTask fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:2px,color:#BF360C classDef gateway fill:#FFF9C4,stroke:#F57F17,stroke-width:2px,color:#E65100 classDef subProc fill:#F3E5F5,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px,color:#4A148C subgraph lane_0["IF Lab S. Loc"] n1["fa:fa-user Create STO 2 (Receiving S. Loc as IMR Location)"] n4[["fa:fa-cog Create STO 1 (Supp. S.Loc as IMR Location)"]] n5[["fa:fa-cog Perform Goods Receipt against STO1"]] n6[["fa:fa-cog Perform Outbound Del . against STO2"]] n7[["fa:fa-cog Post Goods Issue against STO2"]] n13(["fa:fa-play To-Be within IF Same Legal Entity and within Same Plant Process Initiated"]) n14(["fa:fa-stop To-Be within IF Same Legal Entity and within Same Plant Process Completed"]) end subgraph lane_1["SAP S/4 IMR S . Loc."] n2["fa:fa-user Create Prod. Order"] n3["fa:fa-user Create PM Repair Order"] n8[["fa:fa-cog Perform Goods Receipt against Prod. Order"]] n9[["fa:fa-cog Perform/Complete Repair"]] n10[["fa:fa-cog Perform Goods Receipt against STO2"]] n11[["fa:fa-cog Perform Outbound Del ivery against STO1"]] n12[["fa:fa-cog Perform Post Goods Issue against STO1"]] n15(["fa:fa-stop PM Order Created"]) n16(["fa:fa-stop Prod Order Craeted"]) n17(["fa:fa-stop Goods Received against STO2"]) n18{{"fa:fa-code-branch exclusiveGateway"}} end n11 --> n12 n6 --> n7 n13 --> n4 n5 --> n14 n12 --> n5 n18 --> n11 n8 --> n18 n4 --> n18 n1 --> n6 n7 --> n10 n3 --> n15 n2 --> n16 n10 --> n17 n9 --> n18 class n1 userTask class n2 userTask class n3 userTask class n4 serviceTask class n5 serviceTask class n6 serviceTask class n7 serviceTask class n8 serviceTask class n9 serviceTask class n10 serviceTask class n11 serviceTask class n12 serviceTask class n13 startEvt class n14 endEvt class n15 endEvt class n16 endEvt class n17 endEvt class n18 gateway
👁 View Diagram

3.3 Business Roles & Responsibilities

Role / Lane Processes Involved Description
Boundary Apps E2E-113A_IMR_Labs_Process_–_To-Be_from_IP_to_IF,
Intel Foundry Lab E2E-113A_IMR_Labs_Process_–To-Be_from_IP_to_IF, E2E-113B_IMR_Labs_Process–To-Be_within_IF_Different_Legal_Entity_(Part_1), E2E-113C_IMR_Labs_Process_–To-Be_within_IF_Different_Legal_Entity)_(Part_2),
SAP S/4

Intel Foundry IMR | E2E-113A_IMR_Labs_Process_–To-Be_from_IP_to_IF, E2E-113B_IMR_Labs_Process–To-Be_within_IF_Different_Legal_Entity_(Part_1), E2E-113C_IMR_Labs_Process_–To-Be_within_IF_Different_Legal_Entity)_(Part_2), | |

| IF Lab S. Loc | E2E-113D_IMR_Labs_Process_–To-Be_within_IF_Same_Legal_Entity&_within_Same_Plant | | | SAP S/4

IMR S . Loc. | E2E-113D_IMR_Labs_Process_–To-Be_within_IF_Same_Legal_Entity&_within_Same_Plant | |

4. Data Architecture (TOGAF “D”)

4.1 Data Flows — Source to Target

# Flow Chain Hop Source App Source DB Target App Target DB Data Description Frequency Classification
1 e.g. MES Route to ICOST 1 e.g. MES 300 e.g. SAP HANA e.g. XEUS e.g. Azure SQL What data moves e.g. Near Real-Time e.g. Intel Confidential

4.2 Data Flow Diagrams

DATA ARCHITECTURE — Database-to-database data flows. Applications (blue) sit above their hosting databases (green cylinders). Thick arrows show data movement between databases.

4.2.1 Current-State — Current-State Data Flows

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "15px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 35, "rankSpacing": 45}} }%% flowchart TB classDef appBox fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef dbCyl fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:2px,color:#1B5E20 classDef dbCloud fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef dbData fill:#B2EBF2,stroke:#00838F,stroke-width:2px,color:#004D40 classDef eolBox fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C subgraph E2E113CDACL_e_g_Azure_SQL[" "] direction TB E2E113CDAA_e_g_XEUS["e.g. XEUS"]:::appBox E2E113CDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL[("🗄️ e.g. Azure SQL")]:::dbCloud E2E113CDAA_e_g_XEUS -.-> E2E113CDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL end style E2E113CDACL_e_g_Azure_SQL fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:1px subgraph E2E113CDACL_e_g_SAP_HANA[" "] direction TB E2E113CDAA_e_g_MES_300["e.g. MES 300"]:::appBox E2E113CDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA[("🗄️ e.g. SAP HANA")]:::dbData E2E113CDAA_e_g_MES_300 -.-> E2E113CDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA end style E2E113CDACL_e_g_SAP_HANA fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:1px E2E113CDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA ==>|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E113CDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL subgraph Legend["📐 DATA ARCHITECTURE LEGEND"] direction LR L_A["Application"]:::appBox L_D[("🗄️ On-Prem DB")]:::dbCyl L_DC[("🗄️ Cloud DB")]:::dbCloud L_DD[("🗄️ Data Platform")]:::dbData L_E["End-of-Life"]:::eolBox end style Legend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px
👁 View Diagram

4.2.2 Future-State — Future-State Data Flows

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "15px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 35, "rankSpacing": 45}} }%% flowchart TB classDef appBox fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef dbCyl fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:2px,color:#1B5E20 classDef dbCloud fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef dbData fill:#B2EBF2,stroke:#00838F,stroke-width:2px,color:#004D40 classDef eolBox fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C subgraph E2E113FDACL_e_g_Azure_SQL[" "] direction TB E2E113FDAA_e_g_XEUS["e.g. XEUS"]:::appBox E2E113FDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL[("🗄️ e.g. Azure SQL")]:::dbCloud E2E113FDAA_e_g_XEUS -.-> E2E113FDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL end style E2E113FDACL_e_g_Azure_SQL fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:1px subgraph E2E113FDACL_e_g_SAP_HANA[" "] direction TB E2E113FDAA_e_g_MES_300["e.g. MES 300"]:::appBox E2E113FDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA[("🗄️ e.g. SAP HANA")]:::dbData E2E113FDAA_e_g_MES_300 -.-> E2E113FDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA end style E2E113FDACL_e_g_SAP_HANA fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:1px E2E113FDAD_e_g_SAP_HANA ==>|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E113FDAD_e_g_Azure_SQL subgraph Legend["📐 DATA ARCHITECTURE LEGEND"] direction LR L_A["Application"]:::appBox L_D[("🗄️ On-Prem DB")]:::dbCyl L_DC[("🗄️ Cloud DB")]:::dbCloud L_DD[("🗄️ Data Platform")]:::dbData L_E["End-of-Life"]:::eolBox end style Legend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px
👁 View Diagram

4.3 Data Lineage

# Source System Source Schema/Object Target System Target Schema/Object Transformation
1 e.g. MES 300 e.g. CKMLHD table e.g. XEUS e.g. dbo.CostElements Lineage notes

4.4 RICEFW Data Objects

RICEFW data objects (Reports and Conversions) will be auto-populated from the Smartsheet Object Tracker when matched to this capability.

4.5 Data Governance & Quality

Concern Approach
Data Ownership Per-entity owners listed in Section 3.1
Data Classification Financial data classified as Intel Confidential
Data Retention Per Intel corporate retention policies
Data Quality Validated at source; reconciliation at target

5. Application Architecture (TOGAF “A”)

5.1 Current-State — Current-State Application Landscape

Overview

The Current-State architecture represents the current / legacy landscape for E2E-113.This view is generated from CurrentFlows.xlsx (1 flow hops across 1 flow chains).

APPLICATION ARCHITECTURE — Architecture Diagram

Click any system node to open its IAPM application page. Legend: Deployed · Developing · End-of-Life · No IAPM Match

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "18px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial, sans-serif"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 50, "rankSpacing": 60}} }%% flowchart TB %% -- ArchiMate 3.2 + Azure style classes -- classDef business fill:#FFFFB3,stroke:#F9A825,stroke-width:2px,color:#000 classDef app fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef data fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:1px,color:#0D47A1,stroke-dasharray: 5 5 classDef middleware fill:#FFE0B2,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:2px,color:#BF360C classDef eol fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C classDef saas fill:#E1BEE7,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px,color:#4A148C classDef cloud fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:2px,color:#0D47A1 classDef onprem fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:2px,color:#1B5E20 subgraph E2E113CLN_Boundary_Applications[" Boundary Applications"] direction LR E2E113C_e_g_MES_300["📦 e.g. MES 300"]:::app E2E113C_e_g_XEUS["📦 e.g. XEUS"]:::app end E2E113CMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus["🔗 e.g. Azure Service Bus"]:::middleware E2E113CDE_e_g_Cost_Element>"📄 e.g. Cost Element
e.g. CSV / IDoc / JSON"]:::data E2E113C_e_g_MES_300 -->|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E113CMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus E2E113CMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus --> E2E113C_e_g_XEUS style E2E113CLN_Boundary_Applications fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px subgraph Legend["📐 LEGEND"] direction LR L_APP["📦 Application"]:::app L_MW["🔗 Middleware"]:::middleware L_DE>"📄 Data Entity"]:::data L_EOL["⛔ End-of-Life"]:::eol end style Legend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px
👁 View Diagram

Current-State Flow Narrative

# Flow Chain Path Interface Freq
1 e.g. MES Route to ICOST e.g. MES 300 → e.g. XEUS e.g. Direct / API / File e.g. Near Real-Time

5.2 Future-State — Future-State Application Landscape

Overview

The Future-State architecture represents the target landscape for E2E-113.This view is generated from FutureFlows.xlsx (1 flow hops across 1 flow chains).

APPLICATION ARCHITECTURE — Architecture Diagram

Click any system node to open its IAPM application page. Legend: Deployed · Developing · End-of-Life · No IAPM Match

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "18px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial, sans-serif"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 50, "rankSpacing": 60}} }%% flowchart TB %% -- ArchiMate 3.2 + Azure style classes -- classDef business fill:#FFFFB3,stroke:#F9A825,stroke-width:2px,color:#000 classDef app fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef data fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:1px,color:#0D47A1,stroke-dasharray: 5 5 classDef middleware fill:#FFE0B2,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:2px,color:#BF360C classDef eol fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C classDef saas fill:#E1BEE7,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px,color:#4A148C classDef cloud fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#1565C0,stroke-width:2px,color:#0D47A1 classDef onprem fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:2px,color:#1B5E20 subgraph E2E113FLN_Boundary_Applications[" Boundary Applications"] direction LR E2E113F_e_g_MES_300["📦 e.g. MES 300"]:::app E2E113F_e_g_XEUS["📦 e.g. XEUS"]:::app end E2E113FMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus["🔗 e.g. Azure Service Bus"]:::middleware E2E113FDE_e_g_Cost_Element>"📄 e.g. Cost Element
e.g. CSV / IDoc / JSON"]:::data E2E113F_e_g_MES_300 -->|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E113FMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus E2E113FMW_e_g_Azure_Service_Bus --> E2E113F_e_g_XEUS style E2E113FLN_Boundary_Applications fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px subgraph Legend["📐 LEGEND"] direction LR L_APP["📦 Application"]:::app L_MW["🔗 Middleware"]:::middleware L_DE>"📄 Data Entity"]:::data L_EOL["⛔ End-of-Life"]:::eol end style Legend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px
👁 View Diagram

Future-State Flow Narrative

# Flow Chain Path Interface Freq
1 e.g. MES Route to ICOST e.g. MES 300 → e.g. XEUS e.g. Direct / API / File e.g. Near Real-Time

5.3 Change Impact Summary

Change Type Flow Chain Detail
UNCHANGED e.g. MES Route to ICOST No change

Totals: 0 new - 0 removed - 0 modified - 1 unchanged

5.4 Component Overview

System Inventory

System IAPM ID Status
e.g. MES 300 - N/A
e.g. XEUS - N/A

5.5 RICEFW Inventory

RICEFW inventory will be auto-populated from the Smartsheet S/4 Object Tracker when matched to this capability.

5.6 Integration Patterns

# Pattern Flow Chain Middleware Protocol Auth
1 e.g. Pub-Sub / P2P / ETL e.g. MES Route to ICOST e.g. Azure Service Bus e.g. REST / RFC / SFTP e.g. OAuth / NTLM / Cert

6. Technology Architecture (TOGAF “T”)

6.1 Platform & Infrastructure

TECHNOLOGY / PLATFORM ARCHITECTURE — Platforms (green) host applications (blue). Thick arrows show platform-to-platform integration flows.

6.1.1 Current-State — Current-State Platform Architecture

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "14px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 40, "rankSpacing": 50}} }%% flowchart TB classDef appBox fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef platBox fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 classDef eolBox fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C subgraph E2E113CPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS["☁️ e.g. Azure PaaS"] direction LR E2E113CPLA_e_g_XEUS["e.g. XEUS"]:::appBox end style E2E113CPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:3px,color:#003A6C subgraph E2E113CPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023["🖥️ e.g. S/4 HANA 2023"] direction LR E2E113CPLA_e_g_MES_300["e.g. MES 300"]:::appBox end style E2E113CPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023 fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 E2E113CPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023 ==>|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E113CPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS subgraph E2E113CPLLegend["📐 PLATFORM LEGEND"] direction LR E2E113CPLLC["☁️ Cloud"] E2E113CPLLS["🔮 SaaS"] E2E113CPLLO["🏢 On-Prem"] E2E113CPLLD["💾 Data Platform"] E2E113CPLLM["🔗 Middleware"] end style E2E113CPLLegend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px style E2E113CPLLC fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:3px,color:#003A6C style E2E113CPLLS fill:#E1BEE7,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:3px,color:#4A148C style E2E113CPLLO fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 style E2E113CPLLD fill:#B2EBF2,stroke:#00838F,stroke-width:3px,color:#004D40 style E2E113CPLLM fill:#FFE0B2,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:3px,color:#BF360C
👁 View Diagram

Legend: 🖥️ Platform · 📦 Application · ⛔ End-of-Life · 📋 Unassigned

6.1.2 Future-State — Future-State Platform Architecture

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "securityLevel": "loose", "themeVariables": {"fontSize": "14px", "fontFamily": "Segoe UI, Arial"}, "flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": false, "htmlLabels": true, "nodeSpacing": 40, "rankSpacing": 50}} }%% flowchart TB classDef appBox fill:#CCE5FF,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#003A6C classDef platBox fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 classDef eolBox fill:#FFCDD2,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px,color:#B71C1C subgraph E2E113FPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS["☁️ e.g. Azure PaaS"] direction LR E2E113FPLA_e_g_XEUS["e.g. XEUS"]:::appBox end style E2E113FPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:3px,color:#003A6C subgraph E2E113FPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023["🖥️ e.g. S/4 HANA 2023"] direction LR E2E113FPLA_e_g_MES_300["e.g. MES 300"]:::appBox end style E2E113FPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023 fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 E2E113FPLP_e_g_S_4_HANA_2023 ==>|"e.g. Direct / API / File"| E2E113FPLP_e_g_Azure_PaaS subgraph E2E113FPLLegend["📐 PLATFORM LEGEND"] direction LR E2E113FPLLC["☁️ Cloud"] E2E113FPLLS["🔮 SaaS"] E2E113FPLLO["🏢 On-Prem"] E2E113FPLLD["💾 Data Platform"] E2E113FPLLM["🔗 Middleware"] end style E2E113FPLLegend fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px style E2E113FPLLC fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#0078D4,stroke-width:3px,color:#003A6C style E2E113FPLLS fill:#E1BEE7,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:3px,color:#4A148C style E2E113FPLLO fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#2E7D32,stroke-width:3px,color:#1B5E20 style E2E113FPLLD fill:#B2EBF2,stroke:#00838F,stroke-width:3px,color:#004D40 style E2E113FPLLM fill:#FFE0B2,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:3px,color:#BF360C
👁 View Diagram

Legend: 🖥️ Platform · 📦 Application · ⛔ End-of-Life · 📋 Unassigned

Platform Inventory

# Platform Type Systems Using Environment
1 e.g. Azure PaaS Cloud / SaaS e.g. XEUS DEV,QAS,PRD
2 e.g. S/4 HANA 2023 On-Premise e.g. MES 300 DEV,QAS,PRD

6.2 SAP Development Object Status

Metric DEV QAS PRD
Transport Requests
Custom Code Objects
CDS Views
Fiori Apps
BAdIs / Enhancements

6.3 NFRs & Design Principles

Category Requirement Target / SLA Priority
Performance Order/transaction processing within interactive SLA < 3 seconds for online transactions High
Availability Business-critical systems available during extended hours 99.9% (06:00-22:00 all time zones) High
Scalability Support seasonal and promotional volume spikes Handle 2x baseline transaction volume Medium
Recoverability Customer-facing systems recover within business impact window RPO < 30 min, RTO < 2 hours High
Data Volume Support transactional data growth from business expansion 10M+ documents/year Medium
Latency Near-real-time integration for order status updates < 30 seconds for status propagation Medium
Concurrency Support global user base across business functions 300+ concurrent users Medium

6.4 Security & Governance

Concern Approach Standard / Policy Owner
Authentication Single Sign-On (SSO) via Intel corporate Azure AD identity Intel IT Security Policy - Identity Management IT Security
Authorization Role-based access control (RBAC) with SAP authorization objects Intel SAP Security Standards - Role Design SAP Security Team
Data Classification All financial/operational data classified per Intel Data Classification Standard Intel Data Classification Policy Data Governance
Data Encryption (at rest) AES-256 encryption for SAP HANA database and file storage Intel Encryption Standard Infrastructure Security
Data Encryption (in transit) TLS 1.3 for all system-to-system and user-to-system communication Intel Network Security Policy Network Engineering
Network Segmentation SAP systems in dedicated network zones with firewall controls Intel Network Architecture Standard Network Security
API Security OAuth 2.0 / certificate-based authentication for all API integrations Intel API Security Guidelines Integration Architecture
Audit Logging Comprehensive audit trail for all data changes and user actions (SAP Security Audit Log) SOX Compliance / Intel Audit Policy Internal Audit
Certificate Management Automated certificate lifecycle management for system-to-system trust Intel PKI Standard Certificate Authority Team
Compliance SOX controls, export control (EAR/ITAR) screening, data privacy (GDPR) Intel Corporate Compliance Framework Compliance Office

7. Project Context

7.1 Project Roadmap & Go-Live Plan

Project roadmap and RICEFW timelines will be auto-populated from the Smartsheet Object Tracker when matched to this capability.

7.2 RAID Log

RAID items will be auto-populated from the Smartsheet RAID log when matched to this capability.

7.3 Recommendations & Next Steps

# Category Recommendation Priority Owner Target Date Status
1 Architecture Complete extended flow attributes (Data Entity, Integration Pattern, Tech Platform) in Flows tab for full BDAT coverage High Tower Architect 2026-Q2 Open
2 Data Define data ownership and classification for all 1 flow chains to satisfy Data Architecture (TOGAF D) requirements Medium Data Architect 2026-Q3 Open
3 Testing Develop integration test scenarios covering all 1 flow chains for FUT/SIT readiness High Test Lead 2026-Q3 Open
4 Business Architecture Review and validate Business Architecture process steps against latest Signavio/BIC process models Medium Business Analyst 2026-Q2 Open
5 Security Complete security review for API integrations and data flows per Intel Security Architecture standards Medium Security Architect 2026-Q3 Open

E2E-113 — Architecture Document (TOGAF BDAT) · End-to-End Integrated Processes · Generated: April 2026